Subsurface Characterization in Southeastern Asaluyeh Using DC Resistivity and Ground Penetrating Radar

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ostim Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

2 Institute of Geophysics, Tehran university, Tehran, Iran.

3 Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran.

4 Department of earth science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

10.22059/ijmge.2024.381006.595189

Abstract

This paper integrates the results of resistivity tomography and Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) surveys to investigate the structural features of the southestern Asaluyeh site. By combining these geophysical methods with field observations, the study aims to provide a precise interpretation of subsurface conditions, focusing on identifying layer thicknesses, fractures, and weakened zones. The study utilized Direct Current (DC) resistivity and electromagnetic methods, i.e., GPR, both known for their high resolution, rapid data acquisition, and cost-effectiveness. Four DC resistivity and GPR profiles were analyzed where the results show three critical zones of varying layering in the resistivity sections. These zones include the gypsum layer in the marl host and fractures within the marl layer, with depths of influence ranging from 5 to 12 m. The GPR surveys, identified anomalies based on dielectric permittivity differences. The Joint interpretation of DC resistivity and GPR results revealed significant correlations between two methods, enhancing the understanding of subsurface features. Critical zones identified by both methods showed substantial overlap, confirming the presence of subsurface anomalies and providing a comprehensive view of the site's geological conditions. This integrated approach demonstrates the effectiveness of combining DC resistivity and GPR in subsurface investigations, offering valuable insights for similar geotechnical studies.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Cook, P. G., Favreau, G., Dighton, J. C., & Tickell, S. (2006). Hydrology of a fractured rock aquifer under rainfall and irrigation recharge, Clare Valley, South Australia. Hydrogeology Journal, 14(7), 1201-1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-006-0034-6
[2] Schmelzbach, C., Horstmeyer, H., & Juhlin, C. (2007). Shallow 3D seismic-reflection imaging of fracture zones in Crystalline Rock. GEOPHYSICS, 72(6). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2787336
[3] Sicking, C., & Malin, P. (2019). Fracture seismic: Mapping subsurface connectivity. Geosciences, 9(12), 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9120508
[4] Maunde, A., & Bassey, N. E. (2017). Seismic refraction investigation of fracture zones and bedrock configuration for geohydrologic and geotechnical studies in part of Nigeria’s Capital City, Abuja. Journal of Earth Sciences and Geotechnical Engineering, 7(2), 91-102.
[5] Sheehan, J. R., Doll, W. E., Watson, D. B., & Mandell, W. A. (2005). Application of seismic refraction tomography to karst cavities. US geological survey karst interest group proceedings, Rapid City, South Dakota, 29-38.
[6] QIN JingJing, LIU BaoJin, XU HanGang, SHI JinHu, TAN YaLi, HE YinJuan, GUO XinJing. 2020. Exploration of shallow structural characteristics in the Suqian segment of the TanLu fault zone based on seismic refraction and reflection method. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 63(2): 505-516, doi: 10.6038/cjg2020N0144
[7] Varfinezhad, R., Oskooi, B., & Fedi, M. (2020). Joint inversion of DC resistivity and magnetic data, constrained by cross gradients, compactness and depth weighting. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 177(9), 4325–4343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02457-5
[8] Carrière, S. D., Chalikakis, K., Sénéchal, G., Danquigny, C., & Emblanch, C. (2013). Combining Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Ground Penetrating Radar to study geological structuring of karst Unsaturated Zone. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 94, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.03.014
[9] Li, S., Liu, B., Nie, L., Liu, Z., Tian, M., Wang, S., ... & Guo, Q. (2015). Detecting and monitoring of water inrush in tunnels and coal mines using direct current resistivity method: a review. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 7(4), 469-478.
[10] Szalai, S., Kovács, A., Kuslits, L., Facskó, G., Gribovszki, K., Kalmár, J., & Szarka, L. (2018). Characterisation of fractures and fracture zones in a carbonate aquifer using electrical resistivity tomography and pricking probe methodes. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 06(04), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2018.64001
[11] Yanis, M., Ismail, N., & Abdullah, F. (2021). Shallow structure fault and fracture mapping in Jaboi Volcano, Indonesia, using VLF–EM and electrical resistivity methods. Natural Resources Research, 31(1), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-021-09966-7
[12] Parnow, S., Oskooi, B., & Florio, G. (2021). Improved linear inversion of low induction number electromagnetic data. Geophysical Journal International, 224(3), 1505-1522.
[13] Ha, H. S., Kim, D. S., & Park, I. J. (2010). Application of electrical resistivity techniques to detect weak and fracture zones during underground construction. Environmental Earth Sciences, 60, 723-731.
[14] Greve, A. K., Acworth, R. I., & Kelly, B. F. (2010). Detection of subsurface soil cracks by vertical anisotropy profiles of apparent electrical resistivity. Geophysics, 75(4), WA85-WA93.
[15] Elis, V. R., Bondioli, A., Ustra, A. T., Carlos, I. M., & Pozzo, H. Â. P. D. (2019). Resistivity imaging for identification of fracture zones in crystalline bedrock in Brazil. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 5, 1089-1101.
[16] Li, X., Chen, S., Wang, E., & Li, Z. (2021). Rockburst mechanism in coal rock with structural surface and the microseismic (MS) and electromagnetic radiation (EMR) response. Engineering Failure Analysis, 124, 105396.
[17] Oskooi, B., Parnow, S., Smirnov, M., Varfinezhad, R., & Yari, M. (2018). Attenuation of random noise in GPR data by image processing. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 11, 1-10.
[18] Afshar, A., Abedi, M., Norouzi, G., & Riahi, M. (2015). Geophysical investigation of underground water content zones using electrical resistivity tomography and ground penetrating radar: A case study in Hesarak-Karaj, Iran. Engineering Geology, 196, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.07.022
[19] Fehdi, C., Nouioua, I., Belfar, D., Djabri, L., & Salameh, E. (2014). Detection of underground cavities by combining electrical resistivity imaging and ground penetrating radar surveys: A case study from Draa Douamis area (North East of Algeria). H2Karst research in limestone hydrogeology, 69-82.
[20] Mendieta, A. (2017). Seismic Refraction and Electrical Resistivity Tests for Fracture Induced Anisotropy in a Mountain Watershed.
[21] Bahammou, Y. A., Benamara, A., Ammar, A., & Dakir, I. (2019). Fracture zones detection for groundwater exploration integrating Resistivity Profiling and Very Low Frequency electromagnetic methods (Errachidia basin, Morocco). Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, 49(2), 181-194.
[22] Hasan, M., Shang, Y. J., Jin, W. J., & Akhter, G. (2019). Investigation of fractured rock aquifer in South China using electrical resistivity tomography and self-potential methods. Journal of Mountain Science, 16(4), 850-869.
[23] Carollo, A., Capizzi, P., & Martorana, R. (2020). Joint interpretation of seismic refraction tomography and electrical resistivity tomography by cluster analysis to detect buried cavities. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 178, 104069.
[24] Gaballah, M., & Alharbi, T. (2022). 3-D GPR visualization technique integrated with electric resistivity tomography for characterizing near-surface fractures and cavities in limestone. Journal of Taibah university for science, 16(1), 224-239.
[25] Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P., & Sheriff, R. E. (1990). Applied Geophysics. Cambridge University Press.
[26] Palacky, G. J. (1988). Resistivity characteristics of geological targets. In M. N. Nabighian (Ed.), Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics: Volume 1, Theory (pp. 53-129). Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
[27] Dahlin, T. (2001). The development of DC resistivity imaging techniques. Computers & Geosciences, 27(9), 1019-1029.
[28] Loke, M. H., Chambers, J. E., Rucker, D. F., Kuras, O., & Wilkinson, P. B. (2013). Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 95, 135-156.
[29] Bednarczyk, Z., & Szynkiewicz, A. (2015). Applied engineering geology methods for exemplar infrastructure projects in Malopolskie and Podkarpackie provinces. In Engineering Geology for Society and Territory-Volume 6: Applied Geology for Major Engineering Projects (pp. 203-210). Springer International Publishing.
[30] Moghaddam, S., Oskooi, B., Goudarzi, A., & Azadi, A. (2019). The comparative sense of sparse deconvolution and least-squares deconvolution methods in increasing the temporal resolution of GPR data. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 12, 1-10.
[31] Zhang, X., Hu, X., Qiu, Z., Feng, X., & Qin, Y. (2023). Extraction of the GPR instantaneous centroid frequency based on the envelope derivative operator and ICEEMDAN. Remote Sensing Letters, 14(5), 469-478.
[32] Koefoed, O. (1979). Geosounding Principles 1: Resistivity Sounding Measurements. Elsevier.
[33] Hubbard, S. S., & Rubin, Y. (2000). Hydrogeological parameter estimation using GPR and DC resistivity measurements. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 5(2), 45-58
[34] Barbolla, D. F., Negri, S., & Fedi, M. (2022). Analysis of direct current resistivity data using continuous wavelet transform. GEOPHYSICS, 87(5). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2021-0111.1
[35] Loke, M.H., Acworth, R., Dahlin, T., 2003. A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys, Exploration Geophysics, 34(1), 182-87.
[36] Loke, M. H., & Dahlin, T. (2002). A comparison of the Gauss–Newton and quasi-Newton methods in resistivity imaging inversion. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 49(3), 149–162.
[37] Wolke, R., & Schwetlick, H. (1988). Iteratively reweighted least squares: algorithms, convergence analysis, and numerical comparisons. SIAM journal on scientific and statistical computing, 9(5), 907-921.