Characterization of Buner marble from Pakistan for construction purposes

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 National Centre of Excellence in Geology, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.

2 Department of Geology, Bacha Khan University Charsadda, Charsadda, Pakistan.

3 Environmental Systems Engineering, University of Regina, Regina, Canada.

4 Department of Geology, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.

10.22059/ijmge.2024.364177.595094

Abstract

The exploration and management of abundant economic mineral resources of Pakistan, particularly the vast marble deposits in the northwestern region, hold immense potential for driving economic growth. The use of marble in the construction industry faces extensive challenges such as undeveloped mining processing methods, incomplete understanding of marble qualities, undefined selection criteria for suitable varieties, and the environmentally harmful consequences of excessive waste production. This research developed a laboratory investigation protocol to characterize distinct marble deposits in Buner, Pakistan, each offering unique compositions and petrographic features. Three marble varieties were identified including pure calcitic (over 90% calcite) with low silica content (0.1% to 2.5%); impure calcitic (non-carbonate minerals up to 20%) with 19.8% silica and 31% lime; and pure dolomite (over 20% dolomite) with 29% lime and 23% magnesium oxide. The distinctive petrographic features of the marble deposits, such as equigranular structures, subhedral to anhedral grains, granuloblastic textures, and schistosity in impure calcitic, as well as luster-displaying dolomite in pure dolomite, provide valuable insights into their geological characteristics. Furthermore, the physical properties of the marble types exhibit correlations with their compressive and tensile strengths. Notably, the low specific gravity, water absorption, and porosity of the investigated marble result in high strength values. The average compressive strength was found to be 31 MPa for pure calcitic, 35 MPa for impure calcitic, and 59 MPa for pure dolomite marble. Likewise, the tensile strengths measured 6 MPa, 7 MPa, and 9 MPa, respectively. While the investigated marble types prove to be excellent choices for dimension stone applications, it is crucial to note that they do not meet the standards required for cement production and paint manufacturing. This research contributes to the understanding of Pakistan's marble resources, refined processing methods, and sustainable construction practices.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Rosso F, Pisello A, Cotana F, Ferrero M. (2014). Integrated thermal-energy analysis of innovative translucent white marble for building envelope application. Sustainability, 6(8):5439–5462.
  2. Şahan Arel H. (2016). Recyclability of waste marble in concrete production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131(179–188.
  3. Demirel B. (2010). The effect of the using waste marble dust as fine sand on the mechanical properties of the concrete. International journal of physical sciences, 5(9):1372–1380.
  4. Karaşahin M, Terzi S. (2007). Evaluation of marble waste dust in the mixture of asphaltic concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 21(3):616–620.
  5. Awad A, El-gamasy R, Abd El-Wahab AA, Abdellatif MH. (2019). Mechanical behavior of PP reinforced with marble dust. Construction and Building Materials, 228(116766.
  6. Karaşahin M, Terzi S. (2007). Evaluation of marble waste dust in the mixture of asphaltic concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 21(3):616-620.
  7. Wahab GM, Gouda M, Ibrahim G. (2019). Study of physical and mechanical properties for some of Eastern Desert dimension marble and granite utilized in building decoration. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 10(4):907-915.
  8. Yarahmadi R, Bagherpour R, Taherian S-G, Sousa L. (2018). Discontinuity modelling and rock block geometry identification to optimize production in dimension stone quarries. Engineering Geology, 232(22-33.
  9. Salem HS. (2021). Evaluation of the Stone and Marble Industry in Palestine: environmental, geological, health, socioeconomic, cultural, and legal perspectives, in view of sustainable development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(22):28058-28080.
  10. Mustafa S, Khan MA, Khan MR, Hameed F, Mughal MS, Asghar A, et al. (2015). Geotechnical study of marble, schist, and granite as dimension stone: a case study from parts of Lesser Himalaya, Neelum Valley Area, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 74(4):1475-1487.
  11. Yarahmadi R, Bagherpour R, Sousa LM, Taherian S-G. (2015). How to determine the appropriate methods to identify the geometry of in situ rock blocks in dimension stones. Environmental Earth Sciences, 74(9):6779-6790.
  12. Pavičić I, Galić I, Kucelj M, Dragičević I. (2021). Fracture System and Rock-Mass Characterization by Borehole Camera Surveying: Application in Dimension Stone Investigations in Geologically Complex Structures. Applied Sciences, 11(2):764.
  13. Ahmed I, Basharat M, Sousa L, Mughal MS. (2021). Evaluation of building and dimension stone using physico-mechanical and petrographic properties: a case study from the Kohistan and Ladakh batholith, Northern Pakistan. Environmental Earth Sciences, 80(22):1-17.
  14. Scrivano S, Gaggero L, Aguilar JG. (2018). Micro-porosity and minero-petrographic features influences on decay: Experimental data from four dimension stones. Construction and Building Materials, 173(342-349.
  15. Mustafa S, Khan MA, Khan MR, Hameed F, Mughal MS, Asghar A, et al. (2015). Geotechnical study of marble, schist, and granite as dimension stone: a case study from parts of Lesser Himalaya, Neelum Valley Area, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 74(4):1475–1487.
  16. Yusof NQAM, Zabidi H. (2016). Correlation of Mineralogical and Textural Characteristics with Engineering Properties of Granitic Rock from Hulu Langat, Selangor. Procedia Chemistry, 19(975–980.
  17. Tuğrul A, Zarif IH. (1999). Correlation of mineralogical and textural characteristics with engineering properties of selected granitic rocks from Turkey. Engineering Geology, 51(4):303–317.
  18. Sajid M, Arif M. (2015). Reliance of physico-mechanical properties on petrographic characteristics: consequences from the study of Utla granites, north-west Pakistan. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 74(4):1321–1330.
  19. Tandon RS, Gupta V. (2013). The control of mineral constituents and textural characteristics on the petrophysical & mechanical (PM) properties of different rocks of the Himalaya. Engineering Geology, 153(125–143.
  20. Salmi EF, Sellers EJ. (2021). A review of the methods to incorporate the geological and geotechnical characteristics of rock masses in blastability assessments for selective blast design. Engineering Geology, 281(105970.
  21. Yarahmadi R, Bagherpour R, Taherian S-G, Sousa LM. (2018). Discontinuity modelling and rock block geometry identification to optimize production in dimension stone quarries. Engineering Geology, 232(22-33.
  22. Azarafza M, Ghazifard A, Akgün H, Asghari-Kaljahi E. (2019). Development of a 2D and 3D computational algorithm for discontinuity structural geometry identification by artificial intelligence based on image processing techniques. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 78(3371-3383.
  23. Shahriari H, Honarmand M, Mirzaei S, Padró J-C. (2022). Application of UAV photogrammetry products for the exploration of dimension stone deposits: a case study of the Majestic Rose quarry, Kerman province, Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 15(21):1650.
  24. Fahad M, Iqbal Y, Riaz M, Ubic R, Abrar M. (2016). Geo-mechanical properties of marble deposits from the Nikani Ghar and Nowshera formations of the Lesser Himalayas, Northern Pakistan—a review. Himalayan Geology, 37(1):17–27.
  25. Pre-feasibility Study-Marble and Granite Quarrying. Khyber Paktunkhwa Economic Zones Development & Management Company, Department of Industries Commerce & Technical Education, Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa; 2021.
  26. Shakirullah, Afridi MI. (2004). Mineral Development Profile Of North West Frontier Provience And The Role Of Directorate General Mines And Minerals. Journal of Himalayan Earth Sciences, 37(139–154.
  27. Coward MP, Butler R, Chambers A, Graham R, Izatt C, Khan MA, et al. (1988). Folding and imbrication of the Indian crust during Himalayan collision. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A, 326(1589):89–116.
  28. DiPietro J, Lawrence R. (1991). Himalayan structure and metamorphism south of the Main Mantle thrust, Lower Swat, Pakistan. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 9(4):481–495.
  29. DiPietro JA. (1991). Metamorphic pressure‐temperature conditions of Indian Plate rocks south of the main mantle thrust, lower swat, Pakistan. Tectonics, 10(4):742–757.
  30. DiPietro JA, Pogue KR, Hussain A, Ahmad I. (1999). Geologic map of the Indus syntaxis and surrounding area, northwest Himalaya, Pakistan. Special Papers-Geological Society of America:159–178.
  31. Din F, Rafiq M. (1997). Correlation between compressive strength and tensile strength/index strength of some rocks of North-West Frontier Province (limestone and granite). Geological Bulletin, University of Peshawar, 30(183.
  32. Cherkashina TY, Shtel'makh S, Pashkova G. (2017). Determination of trace elements in calcium rich carbonate rocks by Wavelength Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry for environmental and geological studies. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 130(153–161.
  33. C97M-18 AC. ASTM C97 / C97M-18, Standard Test Methods for Absorption and Bulk Specific Gravity of Dimension Stone, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018, www.astm.org.
  34. C170M-17 AC. ASTM C170 / C170M-17 Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Dimension Stone ASTM International West Conshohocken PA 2017.
  35. Vardanega P, Bolton MJCGJ. (2011). Strength mobilization in clays and silts. 48(10):1485-1503.
  36. Aydin A. Upgraded ISRM suggested method for determining sound velocity by ultrasonic pulse transmission technique. The ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 2007-2014: Springer; 2013. p. 95–99.
  37. Friedman GM. (1959). Identification of carbonate minerals by staining methods. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 29(1):87–97.
  38. Rehman Au. Petrographic, Geochemical and Geotechnical Characterization of Marble from Chitral North-West Pakistan [MS Thesis]. Peshawar: University of Peshawar; 2019.
  39. Carr DD, Rooney. L.F. Limestone and dolomite. In: Lefond, S.Y. (Ed.) Industrial Minerals and Rocks. 5th ed. New York: America Inst. Met. And Petr. Engr. Inc; 1983. 833– 868 p.
  40. Ur Rehman A, Ahmed W, Azam S, Sajid M. (2022). Characterization and thermal behavior of marble from northwestern Pakistan. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 7(1-8.
  41. Brook N. The measurement and estimation of basic rock strength. Rock Testing and Site Characterization: Elsevier; 1993. p. 41–66.
  42. Jaeger JC, Cook NG, Zimmerman R. Fundamentals of rock mechanics: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
  43. Bell FG. Engineering in rock masses. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2013.
  44. Shakoor A, Bonelli RE. (1991). Relationship between petrographic characteristics, engineering index properties, and mechanical properties of selected sandstones. Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists, 28(1):55–71.
  45. Blyth FGH, De Freitas M. A geology for engineers. 7th ed: CRC Press; 2017.
  46. Rajput R. Engineering Material. 3rd ed. New Delhi, India: S. Chard & Company Ltd.; 2008.
  47. Boynton RS. (1980). Chemistry and Technology of Lime and Limestone. John Wylie & Sons. Inc, New York:380–486.
  48. Hussain A, Dipietro J, Pogue K, Ahmed I. (2004). Geologic map of 43-B degree sheet of NWFP, Pakistan. Geologic map series, Geological survey of Pakistan, Map, 11).
International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering
Volume 58, Issue 2
June 2024
Pages 135-143

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics