Gas migration through cement slurries analysis: A comparative laboratory study

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

1 School of Mining, Petroleum and Geophysics Engineering; University of Shahrood, Iran

2 Research Institute of Petroleum Industry, Iran

Abstract

Cementing is an essential part of every drilling operation. Protection of the wellbore from formation fluid invasion is one of the primary tasks of a cement job. Failure in this task results in catastrophic events, such as blow outs. Hence, in order to save the well and avoid risky and operationally difficult remedial cementing, slurry must be optimized to be resistant against gas migration phenomenon. In this paper, performances of the conventional slurries facing gas invasion were reviewed and compared with modified slurry containing special gas migration additive by using fluid migration analyzer device. The results of this study reveal the importance of proper additive utilization in slurry formulations. The rate of gas flow through the slurry in neat cement is very high; by using different types of additives, we observe obvious changes in the performance of the cement system. The rate of gas flow in neat class H cement was reported as 36000 ml/hr while the optimized cement formulation with anti-gas migration and thixotropic agents showed a gas flow rate of 13.8 ml/hr.

Keywords


[1] Beirute, R.M., & Cheung, P.R. (1990). Method for selection of cement recipes to control fluid invasion after cementing. SPE Production Engineering 5(04), 433-440.
[2] Scott, S.J., Adel, A.A., & Abdullah, S.A. (2003). Gas migration after cementing greatly reduced. SPE 13th Middle East oil show & conf., Bahrain, April 5-8. doi:10.2118/81414-MS.
[3] Dusterhoft, D., Wilson, G., & Newman, K. (2002). Field study on the use of cement pulsation to control gas migration. SPE gas technology symposium, Calgary, 30 April-2 May. doi:10.2118/75689-MS.
[4] Stewart, R.B., & Schouten, F.C. (1988). Gas invasion and migration in cemented annuli: Causes and cures. SPE Drilling Engineering. 3(1): 77-82.
[5] Dennis, C.L., Eugene, W.T., & Bezner, H.P. (1979). Annular gas flow after cementing: A look at practical solutions. 54th annual technical conference and exhibition of SPE, Las Vegas, September 23-25. doi:10.2118/8255-MS.
[6] Dowel schlumberger (1984). Cementing technology. Nova communications ltd., London, UK, pp. 7-14.
[7] Bannister, C.E., Shuster, G.E., Wooldridge, L.A., & Jones M.J. (1983). Critical design parameters to prevent gas invasion during cementing operations. 58th annual technical conference and exhibition, San Francisco, October 5-8. doi:10.2118/84-35-106.
[8] Rae, P., Wilkins, D., & Free, D. (1989). A new approach to the prediction of gas flow after cementing. SPE/IADC Drilling conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, February 28-March 3. doi:10.2118/18622-MS.
[9] Mohammadi pour M., & Moghadasi J. (2007). New cement formulation that solves gas migration problems in iranian south pars field condition. 15th SPE Middle East Oil & Gas show and conf., Bahrain, March 11-14. doi:10.2118/105663-MS.
[10] Baumgarte, c., Thiercelin, M., & Klaus, D. (1999). Case studies of expanding cement to prevent microannular Formation. SPE annual technical conf. & exhibition, Houston, Texas, October 3-6. doi:10.2118/56535-MS.
[11] Sutton, D.L., & Sabins, F.L. (1991). Interrelationship between critical cement properties and volume changes during cement setting. SPE Drilling Engineering 6(02): 88-94
[12] Sutton, D.L., & Sabins, F.L. (1984). New evaluation for annular gas flow potential. Oil and gas journal (Dec. 17, 1984): 65-70.
[13] Cheung, P.R., & Beirute, R.M. (1985). Gas Flow in Cements. Journal of Petroleum Technology 37(06): 1,041-1,048.