Climate-Smart Mining through Block Matrix Analysis: A Conceptual Modeling Approach for Sustainable Resource Governance

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

School of Mining Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

10.22059/ijmge.2025.400407.595290

Abstract

As climate change intensifies the environmental and operational risks of extractive industries, Climate-Smart Mining (CSM) has emerged as a strategic response to align mining practices with sustainability goals. This study applies a novel block matrix analysis (BMA) framework to conceptualize and evaluate CSM governance structures. Fifteen key sustainability indicators were classified into five strategic domains—legal frameworks, supply chains, resource efficiency, carbon-energy management, and stakeholder engagement—and structured into a 5×5 interaction matrix (M55). Expert scoring from 12 professionals populated the matrix with interaction values ranging from 17.7 to 67.8. Color-coded mapping and determinant-based analysis identified structurally fragile blocks, particularly EOP–EOP (17.7), SII–CE (20.9), and SII–FIM (21.1). Determinants calculated using Barysh and Gaussian methods confirmed structural coherence, yielding values of 218,691.3 and 219,074 respectively, which reflect a highly stable and internally consistent governance matrix rather than fragility. These findings suggest that integrating expert input with matrix determinants offers a robust diagnostic approach for identifying governance weak points and prioritizing reform. The proposed model serves as a scalable decision-support tool for policy planning in mining and environmental sectors facing climate-related uncertainty.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]. Akchurin, M. (2025). Mining, water conflicts, and climate change in Chile’s Atacama Desert. Current History, 124(859), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2025.124.859.61
[2]. Ali, P. O., & Kim, K. N. (2024). Analysis of Indonesia’s priority selection: Energy transition, energy-related measures, mining governance, and resource transition using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Energy for Sustainable Development, 83, 101559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2024.101559
[3]. Azadi, M., Northey, S., Hasanpour, H., & de Vries, G. (2018). Sustainability assessment of mining projects: An evaluation of regulations, policies, and practices. Resources Policy, 59, 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2017.12.004
[4]. Banda, W. (2023). A system dynamics model for assessing the impact of fiscal regimes on mining projects. Resources Policy, 81, 103408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103408
[5]. Bulovic, N., McIntyre, N., & Trancoso, R. (2024). Climate change risks to mine closure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 465, 142697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142697
[6]. Buslaeva, I., & Yakovleva, L. (2022). Block matrix for three-factor analysis of machinery failures. In A. Mottaeva (Ed.), Technological advancements in construction (pp. 303–312). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83917-8_28
[7]. Butcher, J. C. (2015). Algebraic analysis of structure-preserving general linear methods. *Proceedings of the International Conference on Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics 2014 (ICNAAM-2014)*, 020003. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4912307
[8]. Cano, Á., & Kunz, N. C. (2022). Large-scale and small-scale mining in Peru: Exploring the interface. Resources Policy, 76, 102530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102530
[9]. Cao, J., et al. (2024). Fuzzy inference system with interpretable fuzzy rules: Advancing explainable artificial intelligence for disease diagnosis—A comprehensive review. Information Sciences, 662, 120212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2024.120212
[10]. Cavus, N., Mohammed, Y. B., & Yakubu, M. N. (2021). Determinants of learning management systems during COVID-19 pandemic for sustainable education. Sustainability, 13(9), 5189. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095189
[11]. Cole, M. J., & Broadhurst, J. L. (2022). Sustainable development in mining communities: The case of South Africa’s West Wits Goldfield. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.895760
[12]. Dall-Orsoletta, A., et al. (2025). How does social acceptance affect transition minerals production in Europe? A system dynamics approach and case study in Portugal. The Extractive Industries and Society, 22, 101625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2025.101625
[13]. Dobrushkin, V. A. (2017). Applied differential equations with boundary value problems. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315369785
[14]. Domínguez-Gómez, J. A., & González-Gómez, T. (2021). Governance in mining: Management, ethics, sustainability and efficiency. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(3), 100910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2021.100910
[15]. Ed, O., et al. (2024). From sustainable mining to climate-smart mining; lessons for Nigeria. SunText Review of Arts & Social Sciences, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.51737/2766-4600.2024.079
[16]. Essaw, D. W., et al. (2025). Governance for sustainable sand mining in two selected local government areas in the Central Region of Ghana. Society & Natural Resources, 38(4), 394–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2169799
[17]. Gholami, A., Tokac, B., & Zhang, Q. (2024). Knowledge synthesis on the mine life cycle and the mining value chain to address climate change. Resources Policy, 95, 105183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105183
[18]. Guan, X., & Zhao, J. (2022). A two-step fuzzy MCDM method for implementation of sustainable precision manufacturing: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(13), 8085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138085
[19]. Hamediazad, F., & Bahrani, N. (2024). Evaluation of the rock mass strength for hard rock pillar design using bonded block models. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 57(5), 3659–3680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03718-0
[20]. Hanisch, M., et al. (2023). Digital governance: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 162, 113777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113777
[21]. Hodgkinson, J. H., & Smith, M. H. (2021). Climate change and sustainability as drivers for the next mining and metals boom: The need for climate-smart mining and recycling. Resources Policy, 74, 101205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.05.016
[22]. Jiskani, I. M., et al. (2022). Implications to secure mineral supply for clean energy technologies for developing countries: A fuzzy based risk analysis for mining projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, 132055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132055
[23]. Jiskani, I. M., et al. (2023). Mining 4.0 and climate neutrality: A unified and reliable decision system for safe, intelligent, and green & climate-smart mining. Journal of Cleaner Production, 410, 137313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137313
[24]. Karatzinis, G. D., & Boutalis, Y. S. (2025). A review study of fuzzy cognitive maps in engineering: Applications, insights, and future directions. Eng, 6(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6020037
[25]. Lejun, G., et al. (2025). SeqBMC: Single-cell data processing using iterative block matrix completion algorithm based on matrix factorisation. IET Systems Biology, 19(1), e70003. https://doi.org/10.1049/syb2.70003
[26]. Li, G., et al. (2021). A review from environmental management to environmental governance: A paradigm shift for sustainable mining practice in Ghana. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(7), 9710–9724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01050-z
[27]. Odell, S. D., Bebbington, A., & Frey, K. E. (2018). Mining and climate change: A review and framework for analysis. The Extractive Industries and Society, 5(1), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2017.12.004
[28]. Paul, A., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2025). An integrated fuzzy-AHP and fuzzy-DEMATEL approach for analyzing sustainable supply chain factors in the mining industry. Supply Chain Analytics, 10, 100113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2025.100113
[29]. Pearce, T. D., et al. (2011). Climate change and mining in Canada. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 16(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-010-9269-3
[30]. Salmeri, A. (2023). The multi-level governance of space mining. Wolters Kluwer.
[31]. Sarkheil, H. (2024). Dynamic system analysis of key indicators for climate-resilient smart mining within a sustainable governance framework: A focus on the cobalt value chain. SSRNhttps://ssrn.com/abstract=5189964
[32]. Sarkheil, H., & Sadeghy Nejad, A. (n.d.). Hazard identification and process risk assessment at the building stone processing company through combination of EFMEA & William Fine methods. ResearchGatehttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/384920229
[33]. Sarkheil, H., Alghasi, S., & Sadeghy Nejad, A. (2024). Modeling coastal environmental risk assessment: A case study of installing three filtration bases in a deep sea mining structure. Journal of Mining and Environmenthttps://doi.org/10.22044/jme.2024.14304.2673
[34]. Sarkheil, H., Rahbari, S., & Lak, R. (2024). A novel fuzzy deep groundwater sustainability index FDGSI for climate-smart mining and sustainability-aimed governance. SSRNhttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4776925
[35]. Saqlain, M., Kumam, P., & Kumam, W. (2024). Multi-criteria decision-making method based on weighted and geometric aggregate operators of linguistic fuzzy-valued hypersoft set with application. Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applicationshttps://doi.org/10.22105/jfea.2024.475488.1609
[36]. Shamsi, M., Zakerinejad, M., & Zareifard, M. R. (2025). Optimal, reliable, and sustainable technology selection for mining overburden waste utilization using green & climate-smart mining (GCSM): A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making tool. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 13(3), 116118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.116118
[37]. Shome, S., Chakraborty, S., & Sinha, S. (2025). Spatial framework for decision making on mining sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainabilityhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05939-x
[38]. Sonter, L. J., Ali, S. H., & Watson, J. E. M. (2018). Mining and biodiversity: Key issues and research needs in conservation science. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1892), 20181926. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1926
[39]. Stewart, G. W. (2001). Matrix algorithms: Volume II: Eigensystems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
[40]. Wang, P., et al. (2025). Complex modal analysis of a resilient supported conveyor belt: Enhancement of numerical stability by reduced complex transfer matrix method. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies, 13(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-024-01611-w
[41]. Wang, Y., et al. (2023). Cascading impacts of global metal mining on climate change and human health caused by COVID-19 pandemic. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 190, 106800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106800
[42]. World Bank. (2020). Minerals for climate action: The mineral intensity of the clean energy transition. World Bank.
[43]. Yang, Q., & Peng, X. (2023). A fast calculation method for sensitivity analysis using matrix decomposition technique. Axioms, 12(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12020179
[44]. Zamany, A., Khamseh, A., & Iranbanfard, S. (2024). Unveiling the landscape of high-tech transfer in Industry 5.0: A text mining exploration. Journal of AI and Data Mining, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.22044/jadm.2024.14580.2558
[45]. Zhang, Y., Yuan, X., & Wang, K. (2025). Small-signal stability criterion for multibus DC cascaded system based on bus admittance matrix. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 40(5), 6442–6447. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2025.3529485
[46]. A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for selecting a sustainable supplier of forklift filters: A case study from the mining industry. (n.d.). Annals of Operations Researchhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-020-03737-y
[47]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. (2011). *16*(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-010-9269-3