<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2345-6930</Issn>
				<Volume>58</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2024</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Refinement of the flotation reagent plan based on coal feed ash content</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>359</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>370</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">98745</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/ijmge.2024.360260.595070</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Fatemeh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bakhshiyan</LastName>
<Affiliation>Faculty of Engineering, University of Birjand, Birjand, South Khorasan, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Behnamfard</LastName>
<Affiliation>Faculty of Engineering, University of Birjand, Birjand, South Khorasan, Iran.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-9024-1881</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mehdi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Alidokht</LastName>
<Affiliation>Senior process engineer, Tabas Parvadeh Coal Company (TPCCO).</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2023</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>18</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The effect of frother dosage (67, 200, and 400 g/t), collector dosage (200, 600, and 1000 g/t), and frother type (Mixed aliphatic alcohol (MAA), Methyl Isobutyl Carbinol (MIBC), and pine oil) on the flotation performance of three coal samples with various ash contents of 45.1% (high ash content coal, HAC), 36.8% (moderate ash content coal, MAC), and 30.7% (low ash content coal, LAC) was studied. The optimal flotation conditions for each coal sample were quite different. For HAC, a clean coal with an ash content of 12.8% and a yield of 38% was produced under optimal conditions using MIBC as the frother dosage of 361 g/t, and a collector dosage of 200 g/t. In the case of MAC, a clean coal with an ash content of 10.2% and a yield of 46% was produced under optimal flotation conditions using MAA as the frother dosage of 148 g/t, and a collector dosage of 200 g/t. For LAC, a clean coal with an ash content of 9.87% and a yield of 57.4% was produced under optimal flotation conditions using pine oil as the frother dosage of 174 g/t, and a collector dosage of 1000 g/t. For LAC feed coal, in comparison with HAC feed coal, a lower frother at dosage, higher collector dosage, and pine oil frother instead of MIBC must be used. The optimal conditions for HAC flotation were validated in a coal washing plant. After conducting the necessary modifications to the flotation reagent scheme, yield, combustive material recovery (CMR) and separation efficiency (SE) of the plant increased by 5.9%, 11%, and 7.5%, respectively which results in more clean coal production of about 14160 t/y.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Flotation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Feed coal ash content</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Flotation reagent scheme</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Process optimization</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Laboratory and plant validations</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://ijmge.ut.ac.ir/article_98745_348dc21a8acf9658140e0536eb14783d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
